Blog Directory   blog directory | recent blog directory entries | blog directory archive | top keywords | rss feed | submit blog & rss feed/ping
breaking news | news releases |
Oct 15 2008 19:13 GMT

Web Blog Directory Archive


year [ 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 ]
month [ 12 | 11 | 10 | 09 | 08 | 07 | 06 | 05 | 04 | 03 | 02 | 01 ]
day [ 31 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 09 | 08 | 07 | 06 | 05 | 04 | 03 | 02 | 01 ]
hour [ 23 | 03 | 02 | 00 ]

 

Dave Winer: SOAP

Steven Vaughan-Nichols: Fat protocols slow ... (Jan 08 2002 23:32 GMT)

- Steven Vaughan-Nichols: Fat protocols slow Web services. To form an opinion on this you'd have to have an application in mind and then do some performance comparisons under realistic loads. My intuition says it doesn't matter much how fat XML is for protocols -- the Internet and LANs have scaled to push around lots of images and MP3s, which are huge compared to a SOAP or XML-RPC message.

Google
 

weblog directory | recent blog entries | weblog archive | top keywords | rss feed | submit blog & rss feed/ping
breaking news | news releases | about us | contact us |
hosted by wmw web